Date:	Mon, 19 Apr 1999 22:37:27 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Jussi Hamalainen <count AT theblah DOT org>
X-Sender:	count AT shodan DOT irccrew DOT org
To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: List archive?
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.05.9904192236200.12461-100000@shodan.irccrew.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by delorie.com id OAA27731
Reply-To:	pgcc AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Andrew Dodd wrote:

> And, of course, the patch should be taken down, or at least marked as
> "severely broken, no one can compile this" on the PGCC page.

Obviously their code was not very thoroughly tested. I wonder wether
they tested it at all and if they did, how on Earth did they get the
thing to compile successfully? This seems like the Microsoft 
attitude: "It compiled? The first screen came up? Ship it!".

> That PGCC-1.1.2 patch probably should have been marked as an alpha or
> beta. :)

IMHO it shouldn't have found its way to the web page at all since it
obviously is very broken.

-=[ Count Zero / TBH - Jussi Hämäläinen - email count AT theblah DOT org ]=-

- Raw text -