Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/03/13/15:04:06
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 12:24:20AM +0100, Henrik Berglund SdU wrote:
> On 12 Mar 1999, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> > The biggest probelm I see is that 3dnow uses different float formats than the
> > x86 fpu. even worse, you probably won't get improvements in the common case
> > anyway (doubles). also, the interoperability between the x86 fpu and 3dnow is
> > very bad.
> >
> > the good thing is that, finally, its a sane design. a very sane design. if we
> > only had this design from the very beginning (and no x86 fpu).
>
> Is it possible to just use 3dnow instead of the fpu does 3dnow have all
> the required instructions? if so it would be great if it only used the
> 3dnow for fpu operations when typing -march=3dnow or something :)
Unfortunately, its not, as 3dnow does not support all dataformats and
instructions neccessary for this, so we still need the x86 fpu.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -