Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/03/11/21:56:59
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 03:12:56AM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > so you better not try that one. Also, kde only recently upgraded their
> > sources to C++ (they used an unsupported c++ dialect before that pgcc does
> > not understand)).
>
> The only problems, I had (with pgcc 1.1.1), was some mega functions in kspread,
Nice to hear that they finally fixed their stuff.
> What I care is the significant bigger binaries with pgcc (although I use it
> as long as it compiles). Is it because the alignments, or bigger obcodes used?
probably working exception handling and rtti. If kde doesn't depend on that
(they better don't if they want to use gcc) then you might have luck with
-fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
(but you have to compile every c++ file with these switches). Also, newer
binutils compress the exception information.
> > Also, Linus does not support current gcc, egcs or pgcc. Point.
>
> Sometimes, something has to show him, he's mortal, too ;)
Very mortal lately.
> Kernelwise, i will stick to 2.7.2.3 then, but I will try cvs-pgcc on the rest
> and let you you. What cc do you use for your kernel?
gcc -V2.7.2.3
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -