Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/03/09/19:15:36
On Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 03:41:52PM -0700, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 08:45:32PM -0600, Steve Bergman wrote:
> > > I'm getting ready to recompile my RH5.2 system and 2.2.2 kernel. I have an
> > > AMDK6-2/300. Would "-O6 -march=amdk6 -mcpu=amdk6" be reasonable options to set
> > > in rpmrc? What is the status of "-fstrength-reduce" and "-funroll-all-loops"
> >
> > strength-reduce is fixed. it was never broken enough to warrant turning it
> > off in the first place.
> >
>
> The question with strength-reduce popped up few times on egcs list and
> Michael Meissner recommended to turn it off for all register starved
> CPU archs (which I think means all x86 CPUs).
pgcc should be able to compensate. even more, you can't do loop unrolling
without biv+giv analysis (done by the strength-reduce opt).
So, unless benchmarks claim otherwise, -fstrength-reduce should not be turned
off (with pgcc, that is).
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -