Mail Archives: pgcc/1999/03/02/17:33:42
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Eugene M. Indenbom wrote:
> I make gzip using pgcc with the following oprions:
>
> make CC="/home/ddict/glibc/pgcc-1.1.1/gcc/xgcc -B/home/ddict/glibc/pgcc-1.1.1/gcc/" \
> CFLAGS="-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -fno-exceptions
> -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2"
>
> This combination appears to produce the fastest code I can get on my Pentium Pro 180MHz (192MB RAM):
>
> $ time ./gzip -cd egcs-1.1.1.tar.gz > /dev/null
>
> real 0m7.296s
> user 0m7.170s
> sys 0m0.130s
>
> But gzip that I get from very old Slackware distribution (1995) works
> much faster. It was compiled with gcc-2.7.0 -O2 and works more than 5% faster!
>
> $ time /bin/gzip -cd egcs-1.1.1.tar.gz > /dev/null
>
> real 0m6.942s
> user 0m6.730s
> sys 0m0.210s
>
> Stock egcs-1.1.1 looses competition too:
> make CFLAGS="-Os -fomit-frame-pointer -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -fno-exceptions
> -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2"
>
> $ time ./gzip -cd egcs-1.1.1.tar.gz > /dev/null
>
> real 0m7.571s
> user 0m7.350s
> sys 0m0.230s
>
> I send you this fancy executable as attachment and really want to know
> how can this be, why we loose 5% of speed in the 2.9.x gcc code using
> all optimizations invented during past 4 years?
>
> Sincerely Yours, Eugene.
>
> P.S. I am not subscribed to this mailing list
-Os optimizes for smallest binary size, not speed.. Try:
CFLAGS="-O6 -fomit-frame-pointer -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro
-fno-exceptions -pipe -s -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2"
LDFLAGS="-s"
Also, is this old Slackware still a.out, or is it one of the
ELF versions? ELF can be 1-5% slower than a.out..
Thanks,
-Dustin
- Raw text -