X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID:	<19980927190620.C651@nights.dhis.org>
Date:	Sun, 27 Sep 1998 19:06:20 +0200
From:	Matthias Dahl <matthew AT nights DOT dhis DOT org>
To:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Huge Problems with PGCC 1.1 :-(
Reply-To:	matthew AT nights DOT dhis DOT org
References:	<19980926113359 DOT A1249 AT nights DOT dhis DOT org> <19980926214709 DOT A15553 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mutt 0.93.1i
In-Reply-To:	<19980926214709.A15553@cerebro.laendle>; from Marc Lehmann on Sat, Sep 26, 1998 at 09:47:09PM +0200
X-Operating-System:	LinuX 2.0.36pre1
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
X-Status:	A
Lines:	25

On Sat, Sep 26, 1998 at 09:47:09PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:

> The 2.0 kernel versions do not work with any newer compiler. Nobody will fix
> them to do so, either. Your only option for linux-2.0 is to use gcc-2.7.2.
 Well, I just wondered why everything below PGCC 1.1 worked fine and compiled
 the Kernel without any problems... :)

> No, but known serious issues with linux-2.0 ;)
 Ok, I'm going to install the old gcc later as a second compiler. :-)

 Do you know how safe it has already become to use one of the 2.1.x kernels?
 Is there already a release date for the 2.2 (the last was October, AFAIK)?

 Last question. :)
 I'm considering downloading the source for XFree86, but is there a chance
 at all, that it will compile with PGCC 1.1?

Thanks 4 your time and patience. C'ya...

-- 
]\ MATTHEW @ NIGHTS.dhis.org
 / PGP Key @ Request via eMail
 \                                       \        WEB Master of the        /
 / Powered by LINUX 2.0.36pre1           / Dynamic Host Information System \
]\ The Choice of a GNU Generation        \       http://www.dhis.org       /

- Raw text -