X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID:	<19980922222526.33756@cerebro.laendle>
Date:	Tue, 22 Sep 1998 22:25:26 +0200
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To:	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: binary parser?
Mail-Followup-To:	beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 980922142400 DOT 18603B-100000 AT indy1> <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 980922205507 DOT 29820C-100000 AT ursa DOT cus DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SOL.3.96.980922205507.29820C-100000@ursa.cus.cam.ac.uk>; from Dr H. T. Leung on Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 08:59:07AM +0100
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.1.122 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.92.06 19980914 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental))
Status:	RO
Lines:	18

On Tue, Sep 22, 1998 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dr H. T. Leung wrote:
> This is probably an FAQ: is it possible to parse a binary compiled by pgcc
> to make it *slightly* more readable? I mean into assembler or whatever; I
> guess I am asking for pgcc decompiling :-). 

No, there isn't, but whats wrong with the assembly code that gcc outputs?
I don't think a decompiler could give you better commented code, the only
implications is that you need the source.

If you don't have the source, you can use objdump to deassemble the file.

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |

- Raw text -