Mail Archives: pgcc/1998/09/14/01:35:49
On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 04:27:26AM -0500, Shawn Leas wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 1998, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 04:11:00AM -0500, Shawn Leas wrote:
> > > On Sun, 13 Sep 1998, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > >
> > > RedHat has glibc 2.0.6+ a bunch of patches making it 2.0.7 or something.
> > > That's just fine for a libc, and your libc5 is just there so you can run
> > > most Slackware stuff.
> >
> > he asked libc-5.3 vs. libc 5.4, this is an issue independent of glibc and
> > slackware.
>
> But when he's running RedHat he isn't even going to use his libc5 to link
> the egcs/pgcc binary, making it a non-issue.
You forget that
- not all redhat versions use glibc
- users that ask such questions usually use the binary snapshot, which
requires glibc1
> I think he was just worried about the stated requirements on the web page,
> and in particular one that only applies when using libc5 as the default
> libc on your linux system.
No, it applies if he's using the provided pgcc binary.
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -