X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-Id:	<3.0.32.19980720170014.00941da0@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender:	diep AT xs4all DOT nl
X-Mailer:	Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 1998 17:00:31 +0000
To:	"Konst. V. Kunshchikov" <kvk AT ovti DOT mipt DOT ru>
From:	Vincent Diepeveen <diep AT xs4all DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: speed PGCC vs GCC for DIEP
Cc:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Mime-Version:	1.0
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
Lines:	46

At 05:18 PM 7/20/98 +0400, Konst. V. Kunshchikov wrote:
>
>	Hello!
>
>On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>> I compared the speed of pgcc to gcc 2.7.2.3/2.8.1. 
>Please check http://www.goof.com/pcg for pgcc.
>And then send your results.

READ WHAT I WROTE!

What's this for nonsense? I DID install pgcc and the results i
give are speed relative to 2.7.2.3 and 2.8.1, because 2.7.2.3 and 2.8.1
are EXACTLY as fast for my program.

I have even give you the pgcc version number:

pgcc: 2.90.29

In not a single test pgcc was faster than gcc, and gcc is 10% slower than
msvc++ 5.0

READ WHAT I WROTE!

>> I wonder what optimizations i can try. My program does 
>> NOT use any float, only integers and unsigned chars.
>
>>
> ....skip
>>
>
>> Greetings,
>> Vincent
>> 
>
>Regards,
>	Konstantin
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Konst. V. Kunshchikov, 
>computer software & system development, kvk AT ovti DOT mipt DOT ru
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>

- Raw text -