X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Delivered-To:	pcg AT goof DOT com
Message-ID:	<19980521173236.63995@cerebro.laendle>
Date:	Thu, 21 May 1998 17:32:36 +0200
From:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject:	Re: size differences g++ en gcc
Mail-Followup-To:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
References:	<3562EC4C DOT 41F93E45 AT ehv DOT sc DOT philips DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3562EC4C.41F93E45@ehv.sc.philips.com>; from Remco van den Berg on Wed, May 20, 1998 at 04:44:28PM +0200
X-Operating-System:	Linux version 2.1.101 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.28 19980508 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental))
Status:	RO
Lines:	21

On Wed, May 20, 1998 at 04:44:28PM +0200, Remco van den Berg wrote:
> Can somebody explain to me why normal C code compiled with  G++ is
> smaller in size than when I compile it with GCC ?

It isn't. I'm pretty sure you are comparing different compileres, i.e. your
"gcc" might be pgcc, while your "g++" might be gcc-2.7.2 or sth. else. (Have
you compiled it yourself or installed both packages?).

> I also had the feeling that the pgcc compiler generates larger
> code than gcc-2.7.2. Is that all because of the optimization?

Yes. Given some compiler switches, you should be able to get smaller
programs then 2.7.2 (-m486) as well. (try -O2 -Os).

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |

- Raw text -