delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-pop3-spooler: | POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs- |
Delivered-To: | pcg AT goof DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 07 May 1998 11:47:45 +0200 (CEST) |
From: | Mailing lists account <linux AT windows95 DOT sucks DOT eu DOT org> |
Subject: | Re: linux, pgcc and xfree332 |
In-reply-to: | <XFMail.980428213854.frank_stulle@public.uni-hamburg.de> |
X-Sender: | linux AT k6 DOT bero |
To: | frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de |
Cc: | beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl |
Message-id: | <Pine.LNX.3.96.980507114648.516A-100000@k6.bero> |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
Sender: | Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com> |
Status: | RO |
Lines: | 14 |
On Sat, 25 Apr 1998 frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de wrote: > I am using Linux 2.0.32 and I'm wondering if there would be any speed > enhancement when I compile the XFree332-Source with PGCC instead of using the > precompiled binaries? > Do you think this is worth the work? It is. I haven't run any benchmark tests, but my X (R6.3/XFree332) has improved noticeably after recompiling with pgcc and -mamdk6 -march=amdk6 LLaP bero
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |