delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-pop3-spooler: | POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs- |
Delivered-To: | pcg AT goof DOT com |
Message-ID: | <19980428231556.26007@cerebro.laendle> |
Date: | Tue, 28 Apr 1998 23:15:56 +0200 |
From: | Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com> |
To: | frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de |
Cc: | beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl> |
Subject: | Re: linux, pgcc and xfree332 |
Mail-Followup-To: | frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de, |
beastium <beastium-list AT desk DOT nl> | |
References: | <XFMail DOT 980428213854 DOT frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <XFMail.980428213854.frank_stulle@public.uni-hamburg.de>; from frank_stulle@public.uni-hamburg.de on Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 12:38:53AM +0200 |
X-Operating-System: | Linux version 2.1.98 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.91.25 19980425 (gcc2 ss-980401 experimental) executing gcc version pgcc-2.91.19) |
Status: | RO |
Lines: | 20 |
On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 12:38:53AM +0200, frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de wrote: > I am using Linux 2.0.32 and I'm wondering if there would be any speed > enhancement when I compile the XFree332-Source with PGCC instead of using the > precompiled binaries? > Do you think this is worth the work? I'm not sure... The speed enhancement depends on your hardware.. a well-accelerated driver usually doesn't get much from improved code. The old XFree2.0 svga server was quite improved back when I had a cirrus and made benchmarks... At the moment, neither egcs nor pgcc seem to be able to compile xfree332 correctly on my system (everything except the servers work fine, though). -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |