X-pop3-spooler:	POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 3 961213 -bs-
Delivered-To:	pcg AT goof DOT com
Message-Id:	<199802272331.RAA03009@mail.mankato.msus.edu>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:31:25 -0600 (CST)
From:	Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey DOT hundstad AT mankato DOT msus DOT edu>
Subject:	followup - Was: zlib-1.0.4 problems with pgcc-2.91.03 971225 (gcc-2
	.8.0)
To:	pcg AT goof DOT com
cc:	beastium-list AT desk DOT nl
In-Reply-To:	<19980201152102.55205@cerebro.laendle>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
Lines:	47

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hello,

I just compiled the shared library support for zlib-1.1.0 with
pgcc-2.91.09 980221 (gcc-2.8.0 release) and believe it or not the make
test SUCCEEDS using:

- -O9 -frisc -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions

Yea!

Thanks Marc Lehmann for all your help!

Jeffrey Hundstad

PS:  zlib - http://www.cdrom.com/pub/infozip/zlib/
     pgcc - http://www.goof.com/pcg/

On  1 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 1998 at 02:35:50PM -0600, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
>> I've just compiled zlib-1.0.8 successfully with
>> pgcc-2.91.04 980115 (gcc-2.8.0 release).
> 
> actually, it's a rather funny bug in egcs (and gcc). the jump optimization
> uses information that isn't available at that time. Unfortunetly, in egcs,
> the only fix is to disable most of jump optimization.
> 
> in pgcc, I could try to "fix" it by adding another flow analysis pass, which
> makes the compiler even slower (and isn't exactly the right fix).
> 
> Please tell me if it works with the next snaspshot (the one after 980129).
> 
> It's a unwritten laq that I find most bugs just after a snapshot ;)




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNPdMtaLa8RgOE1M5AQFaogQAglUAHPozNSQj+YR4PqoIlBlBbFzduBTH
Vl8LpFKTml/bxMahqGUxjoL67YCzSu5S2WnKRjZ8P35XgKN4np6wy9iOY79WnLet
4hz1tLNnbBueiqSHKKpWc9NazN9tLXKryfj9KVZSzeHQUF6pLwF3KJ50zuCT0UNv
DjG0Jq6C2VE=
=x+DA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- Raw text -