Mail Archives: pgcc/1998/02/01/22:10:49
On Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 09:52:28AM +0000, nuke AT bayside DOT net wrote:
> i get this compiling the latest pgcc:
I guess it is a redhat 5.0 system? (and may I guess this hapens with egcs
also?)
I once tried to track it down (on the phone) with a friend, but couldn't
find out what it was. (help appreciated ;)
> -lang-c -I. -I. -I./config -undef -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUC_MINOR__=7
> -D__ELF__ -Dunix -Dlinux -D__ELF__ -D__unix__ -D__linux__ -D__unix
> -D__linux -Asystem(posix) -D__OPTIMIZE__ -Di386 -Di586 -Asystem(unix)
> -Acpu(i386) -Amachine(i386) -D__i386__ -D__i586__ -Asystem(unix)__
> -Acpu(i386)__ -Amachine(i386)__ __ __ __ __ __ __
> __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ -DIN_LIBGCC1 -DL_mulsi3 ./libgcc1.c
> /tmp/cca13517.i
since your _installed_ gcc calls cpp with illegal args, this is most
probably a bug in the gcc you already have installed.. it might be that gcc
is searching for the wrong files (but I can only imagine the specs file)
is it 2.7.2.3 from redhat?
> those __'s aren't valid cpp options, and they're messing things up
> i really have no idea why it's doing this.
Bad, I don't have either, although I would reaaly like to find
out why gcc is doing sth. that dumb, but I can't reproduce it!
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
- Raw text -