X-POP3-Rcpt:	mlehmann AT universe DOT sgh-net DOT de
Message-ID:	<34CD8DC9.8271A019@medchem2.pharmazie.uni-halle.de>
27 Jan 1998 08:33:30 +0100 :
From:	Mathias Weigt <p5iba AT medchem2 DOT pharmazie DOT uni-halle DOT de>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.03 [de] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject:	Re: PGCC and configure scripts
References:	<199801260337 DOT VAA00930 AT pm2-84 DOT tcgcs DOT com> <34CC4933 DOT 562CD826 AT medchem2 DOT pharmazie DOT uni-halle DOT de> <19980126171614 DOT 17040 AT cerebro DOT laendle>
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
X-Status:	A
Lines:	21

Servus !

> Anyway, ld shouldn't be used to build shared libraries on ELF & GCC
> systems, these should use gcc instead.

I don`t understand this, gcc not ld should be used ? I see I know very little
about gcc...

> > The correct position of ld is found. I don`t know how to fix this and in
> > result I got only static libraries in many programs (e.g. gimp-0.99.17,

I got gimp-0.99.18 yesterday and this seems to be fixed.I`ll check if updating
the libtools will fix this in the other packages.
Also the -O2 flag has been removed from the configure. And here is the next
question: If -O2 remains in configure
and I run it the proposed way : CC="gcc -O6 ..." ... compiling goes this way:
gcc -O6 .... -O2 ...
Which optimization is used ? (Has -O6 been overwritten by the -O2?)

Thanks for answering !

- Raw text -