X-POP3-Rcpt:	mlehmann AT universe DOT sgh-net DOT de
25 Jan 1998 20:54:43 +0100 (CET) :
From:	Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <linux AT bero-online DOT ml DOT org>
X-Sender:	linux AT ufp DOT in-trier DOT de
To:	Andrew J Prowant <ajpst27+@pitt.edu>
cc:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject:	Re: PGCC and GCC 2.8?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.3.96L.980125123525.2857B-100000@unixs4.cis.pitt.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980125201943.343A-100000@ufp.in-trier.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
Lines:	26

On Sun, 25 Jan 1998, Andrew J Prowant wrote:

> Hi, I just joined the list and I was wondering if there are any plans for
> a PGCC release based off of GCC 2.8?  Or is there no reason to? 

pgcc *IS* based on gcc 2.8 - it's based on egcs, which in turn is based on
gcc 2.8.

If you're talking about a gcc-2.8.0-pgcc-something.diff file, it's of no
use because egcs/pgcc use a directory structure completely different from
gcc 2.8 etc., the diff would be bigger that the full
pgcc-something.tar.gz.

LLaP
bero

-- bero AT bero-online DOT ml DOT org - ICQ/UIN 6545964 - http://www.star-trek.ml.org/ --

"Nobody will ever need more than 640k RAM!"
                           -- Bill Gates, 1981
"Windows 95 needs at least 8 MB RAM."
                           -- Bill Gates, 1996
"Nobody will ever need Windows 95."
                           -- logical conclusion

- Raw text -