X-POP3-Rcpt:	mlehmann AT universe DOT sgh-net DOT de
23 Jan 1998 21:00:47 +0100 (CET) :
From:	Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <linux AT bero-online DOT ml DOT org>
X-Sender:	linux AT ufp DOT in-trier DOT de
To:	Dustin Marquess <jailbird AT alcatraz DOT fdf DOT net>
cc:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject:	Re: 6x86 opts
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980123132933.1146A-100000@sanitarium.fdf.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980123205847.28914A-100000@ufp.in-trier.de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
Lines:	38

On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Dustin Marquess wrote:

> 	On a side note does anybody here have any good experiences with
> glibc 2.0.6?

I've been running glibc 2.0.6 since it came out, without problems.

>  I tried 2.0.5c a few months ago and it was a pain.  I had to
> hack the include files to fix conflicts between glibc and kernel includes
> to even compile anything.

That's still the case - you're not supposed to use kernel includes
anymore, which is one of the main advantages of glibc over libc 5.x.
(Don't hack the include files, hack the programs calling them. There are
several sites on the net providing patches to some important apps, such as
http://www.glibc.ml.org/.)

>  Once I got that done I had problems with the pw
> routines skipping the gecos field in my shadow'd password files... Anybody
> know if 2.0.6 is any better?

I'm not using the gecos field. You might have to install an extra shadow
package.

LLaP
bero


-- bero AT bero-online DOT ml DOT org - ICQ/UIN 6545964 - http://www.star-trek.ml.org/ --

"Nobody will ever need more than 640k RAM!"
                           -- Bill Gates, 1981
"Windows 95 needs at least 8 MB RAM."
                           -- Bill Gates, 1996
"Nobody will ever need Windows 95."
                           -- logical conclusion

- Raw text -