X-POP3-Rcpt:	mlehmann AT universe DOT sgh-net DOT de
Message-ID:	<XFMail.980110015404.multiman@voicenet.com>
X-Mailer:	XFMail 1.2 [p0] on Linux
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<19980109120603.62837@cerebro.laendle>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 1998 01:54:04 -0500 (EST)
From:	multiman <multiman AT voicenet DOT com>
To:	beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject:	Re: Linux PGCC 971225 and POV
Sender:	Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status:	RO
X-Status:	AF
Lines:	31

I am using libc 5.4.38.  I tried using the double-aligning and not using
double-aligning and it ran the same speed with or without it.

On 09-Jan-98 Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 1998 at 12:01:57AM -0500, multiman wrote:
>> To Whom it may concern
>> 
>> When I recompiled POV 3 with pgcc 971225 on Linux the resulting binary ran
>> 3X SLOWER than the offical linux binary on the same scene.
>> 
>> The flags I used where -O6 -mpentium -march=pentium
> 
> hmm... which libc library do you use? have you used the correct
> double-aligning? otherwise, fpu performance under pentiums is
> more or less totally random anyway..
> 
>       -----==-                                              |
>       ----==-- _                                            |
>       ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
>       --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
>       -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
>     The choice of a GNU generation                        |
>                                                           |

----------------------------------
E-Mail: multiman <multiman AT voicenet DOT com>
Date: 10-Jan-98
Time: 01:51:27

This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------

- Raw text -