Mail Archives: opendos/2009/02/03/19:03:27
The key advantage of DR-DOS in achieving the maximum
free conventional memory is the DPMS driver, which
allows DPMS-aware drivers such as NWCDEX and NWCACHE
(also, some builds of Netware, I believe) to load
almost entirely into extended memory.
With a bit of work, you can achieve over 100K extra
free conventional memory compared to an equivalent
MS-DOS configuration.
DR-DOS also supports task switching and multi-tasking,
although for me these weren't stable, unfortunately.
However, the official releases of DR-DOS only support
LBA and FAT32 using additional drivers, which totally
negates the memory benefits of using DR-DOS. Udo's
enhanced OpenDOS 7.01 provides native support of LBA
and FAT32, so if you're interested in pursuing DR-DOS
as your O/S, that's the way to go.
As for W95, the original version (MS-DOS 7.0) did NOT
support FAT32. I don't know if it supported LBA, but
that point would be mute, anyway. It was W95A (MS-DOS
7.1) that introduced FAT32 support.
Similarly for PC-DOS, version 7.0 and 2000 did not
support FAT32 (nor I believe, LBA). Version 7.1, which
doesn't seem to have been released as a stand-alone
product, does support FAT32 and LBA.
As for LFN support, the command processors of DR-DOS
7.02/7.02 (possibly also OpenDOS 7.01) will work with
Henrik Haftmann's DOSLFN driver. However, Caldera never
did implement this stuff properly, so deleting a file
for example, can result in invalid LFN entries in the
directory.
MS-DOS 7.1's command processor also will work with
Henrik Haftmann's DOSLFN driver. PC-DOS 7.1 however,
won't (it probably supports LFN under Windoze but
assumes there's no third-party LFN functionality
avaliable, such as DOSLFN).
Joe.
>=20
Joe daSilva
Senior Electronic Engineer
Landis+Gyr
Phone: +61 2 9690 7309
joe DOT dasilva AT landisgyr DOT com
http://www.landisgyr.com/
Manage Energy Better
-----Original Message-----
> From: RiverWind [mailto:riverwind AT shellworld DOT net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2009 3:54 AM
> To: Open Dos Discussion Group
> Subject: Specific Technical Questions Concerning DRDOS
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Greetings,
>=20
> Well good people, I hate to impose upon you yet again. I have
> downloaded a file called "drdos73.exe." I believe that when the
> executable is run it will produce multiple installation disks for
> DRDOS7.3.
>=20
> Now then, I am interested in how I would go about tweaking memory
> in order to hopefully surpass conventional memory or perhaps use it
> more advantageously. You see, MSDOS has its "memmaker" and "emm386"
> with which the machine's memory is maximized as much as possible.
> Moreover, PCDOS put out by IBM has its "emm386" and also
> "ramboost." Now ramboost is by far one of the best memory
> management programs I've ever seen. However, it still seems
> restricted to the confines of conventional memory. My question is
> this. To what extent, if any, is DRDOS able to circumnavigate this
> restriction? For that matter is such a thing even possible?
>=20
> Lastly, does DRDOS provide any sort of multi-tasking facility which
> would allow one to run more than one DOS application at the same
> time, like say through a shell feature? Does DRDOS support long
> file names? Lastly, what kind of tutorial documentation does it
> come with?
>=20
> Bright Blessings,
> RiverWind
>=20
>=20
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING THIS EMAIL.
This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be =
legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an =
authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited =
from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or =
its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please =
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of =
this message and any attachments. Thank you.
- Raw text -