X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to opendos-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:35:47 -0500 (EST)
From:	RiverWind <riverwind AT shellworld DOT net>
To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Most Recent Copy of DRDOS
In-Reply-To:	<49887BD4.2030301@pobox.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.BSF.4.64.0902031433130.44249@server1.shellworld.net>
References:	<Pine DOT BSF DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 0902021415390 DOT 78918 AT server1 DOT shellworld DOT net>
	<op DOT uoqpirj7zoz8ct AT p1800> <Pine DOT BSF DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 0902030022430 DOT 5735 AT server1 DOT shellworld DOT net>
	<alpine DOT LFD DOT 1 DOT 10 DOT 0902030629480 DOT 26040 AT grumble DOT deltasoft DOT com> <49887BD4 DOT 2030301 AT pobox DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Greetings,

You know fat32 and long file names is a huge plus for me. However,
I have yet to find a version of fredos that is available for
download that doesn't have to be compiled. Might any of you know
where I might find a complete version of fredos? I have visited the
project's website, but all they seem to have are versions that need
to be compiled. Lastly, what type of memory manage resources does
fredos have?

Bright Blessings,
RiverWind

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Alain M. wrote:

> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:16:04 -0200
> To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
> From: Alain M. <alainm AT pobox DOT com>
> Subject: Re: Most Recent Copy of DRDOS
> 
> Even more, FreeDOS has FAT32 and LFN
>
> Gene Buckle escreveu:
>>  On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, RiverWind wrote:
>> 
>> >  Thanks so much for your response. I shall check into it and let everyone 
>> >  know the results. $35 is not unreasonable for a fully functioning 
>> >  version of dos.
>> >
>>  ....and it's also a waste of money when OpenDOS is essentially the same
>>  and free.
>>
>>  g.
>> 
>
>

- Raw text -