delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to opendos-bounces using -f |
Date: | Wed, 1 Sep 2004 19:24:21 -0300 |
From: | Enrique Baraibar <enribar AT fastlink DOT com DOT uy> |
To: | opendos AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: samba+TCP/IP client for DOS or mars-nwe+clients netware? |
Message-Id: | <20040901192421.3c95a4c1.enribar@fastlink.com.uy> |
In-Reply-To: | <20040901135322.12632.qmail@web14522.mail.yahoo.com> |
References: | <20040901135322 DOT 12632 DOT qmail AT web14522 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> |
X-Mailer: | Sylpheed version 0.9.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Spam-Status: | No, hits=2.8 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50, |
UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY autolearn=no version=2.64 | |
X-Spam-Level: | ** |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on smtp.netgate.com.uy |
X-Virus-Scanned: | clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c |
on smtp.netgate.com.uy | |
X-Virus-Status: | Clean |
Reply-To: | opendos AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | opendos AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 06:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Martin C <forolinux AT yahoo DOT com> wrote: > Hello. > > snip > > > The other option is to run mars-nwe in the server. > Have anyone tried it in production? My program does > run with it, but I need it to be reliable... And I > haven't test it with many client neither... > > Thank you in advance! > > Mart_n. > A customer of mine (I am a CPA) has gone from NetWare 4.11 to Linux + Mars-nwe. The clients (about 12) run either DrDOS + VLM or Linux + DOSemu + DrDOS + VLM. It is now 8 months since the switch and they have never looked back. Only caveat is that IPX interface must be created with IPXtools and not repeat not with mars-nwe itself. It seems that if you use IPXtools the bug which makes DOSemu clients lose idle connections after about 10 min. vanishes without trace. IMHO, if you use DOS clients, you must go ncp. Micro$oft DOS client's absurd memory requirement is about 200k. Compare this with the 5k of Novell's DOS Client32 2.71 and, for me at least, there is no more time to lose arguing. Hth. -- Enrique Baraibar
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |