Mail Archives: opendos/2002/09/25/21:42:59
Message-ID: | <002801c264fd$d34d09a0$3036ed18@ross2mustss87c>
|
From: | "John T Ross" <johnross AT gci DOT net>
|
To: | <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
|
Subject: | Combining DR-DOS 7.03 with OEM DR-DOS 7.05 to gain LBA capabilities
|
Date: | Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:41:25 -0800
|
MIME-Version: | 1.0
|
X-Priority: | 3
|
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal
|
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
|
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
|
Reply-To: | opendos AT delorie DOT com
|
On 9/23/02 Matthias Paul wrote:
> What do you mean by DR-DOS 7.03B or 7.03C? Since you still
> use the 7.03 IBMDOS.COM file, the DOS kernel (BDOS) would
> not change in any way.
When I installed DR-DOS 7.03 on my laptop, and typed VER at the
command prompt, the OS reports it's DR-DOS 7.03b. I don't recall
anymore about the verbage. Whether it stated Caldera, Lineo, or
Digital Research. I no longer have DR-DOS 7.03 installed on that
particular drive. I was having problems with not enough memory
when loading drivers for my PCMCIA drive.
We discussed this once before in private e-mail wherein you asked me
for the dates of certain files in the program. I believe you told me I
had the latest version of those files installed.
If you peruse this site, http://www.opus.co.tt/dave/index.htm ,
under Alternative DOSes you'll also find a link to Lineo DR-DOS
7.03b that launches into Florian Xaver's www.drdos.org .
Anyways, I took another look at your article, Caldera OpenDOS - A
fresh breeze in DOS technology, at
http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs180/opendeng.html . From the information
there I determine there will not be any new releases or updates to
DR-DOS 7.03. My hinting for a version 7.03c was inappropriate.
It appears the next step would be Caldera's OpenDOS 7.02. In simple
layman's terms what does it do that DR-DOS 7.03 doesn't?
Yours,
John
- Raw text -