delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: opendos/2002/09/22/23:36:16

Message-ID: <001501c26296$2e6877d0$3036ed18@ross2mustss87c>
From: "John T Ross" <johnross AT gci DOT net>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>, <Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Subject: HIMEM.SYS and DOS 8
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:14:27 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C26253.20052190
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 Matthias Paul wrote:

>A forth solution is to combine the DR-DOS 7.05 IBMBIO.COM
>with the DR-DOS 7.03 IBMDOS.COM. This will give the OS full
>native LBA capabilities (at a minimal extra memory footprint),
>but no FAT32 support. Since the 7.05 BIOS would try to log
>in FAT32 partitions, which the 7.03 BDOS could not handle,
>it is important that you do *not* have any FAT32 partitions,
>in case you want to give this unofficial solution a try.
>In case there would be strong interest in this solution,
>I might (no promise!) come up with a binary patch to keep
>the 7.05 BIOS from logging in FAT32 partitions, so that
>it can be used a bit more savely.

(sic safely?)

You previously explained to me use of the extended
partition type C5h, instead of the old 05h type, to allow
DR-DOS 7.03 coexist with a LBA enabled OS using disk
space above 8 Gb.

Will you elaborate on the combination of the DR-DOS 7.05
IBMBIO.COM and DR-DOS 7.03 IBMBIO.COM files? I
understand one's need to ensure the hard drive doesn't
contain any FAT32 partitions. I agree that a binary patch
to keep the 7.05 BIOS from logging into FAT32 partitions
is a useful saftey net.

If I use a PC with a flash BIOS that supports LBA hard
drives, what does this 4th solution offer that the former
doesn't?

I assume it limits one to using a single OS on the hard
drive?

Since no FAT32 partitions are used (or read with the
binary patch) DR-DOS 7.03 is still limited to 2 Gb
partitions isn't it?

Would this combination of IBMBIO.COM files and the
binary patch mean the evolution of DR-DOS 7.03b to
DR-DOS 7.03c?

I for one would like to know more about this solution and
the binary patch also.

Thank you,

John  =20



 
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C26253.20052190
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman">On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 Matthias Paul=20
wrote:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&gt;A forth solution is to combine the DR-DOS 7.05 =
IBMBIO.COM<BR>&gt;with=20
the DR-DOS 7.03 IBMDOS.COM. This will give the OS full<BR>&gt;native LBA =

capabilities (at a minimal extra memory footprint),<BR>&gt;but no FAT32 =
support.=20
Since the 7.05 BIOS would try to log<BR>&gt;in FAT32 partitions, which =
the 7.03=20
BDOS could not handle,<BR>&gt;it is important that you do *not* have any =
FAT32=20
partitions,<BR>&gt;in case you want to give this unofficial solution a=20
try.<BR>&gt;In case there would be strong interest in this =
solution,<BR>&gt;I=20
might (no promise!) come up with a binary patch to keep<BR>&gt;the 7.05 =
BIOS=20
from logging in FAT32 partitions, so that<BR>&gt;it can be used a bit =
more=20
savely.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">(sic safely?)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">You previously explained to me use of =
the=20
</FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">extended</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">partition type C5h, instead of the old =
05h type,=20
to </FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">allow</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">DR-DOS 7.03 coexist with a LBA enabled =
OS using=20
</FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">disk</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">space above 8 Gb.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Will you elaborate on the combination =
of the=20
DR-DOS 7.05</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">IBMBIO.COM and DR-DOS 7.03 IBMBIO.COM =
files?=20
I</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">under</FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans =
MS">stand=20
one's need to ensure the hard drive doesn't</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">contain </FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic =
Sans MS">any=20
FAT32 partitions. I agree that a binary </FONT><FONT=20
face=3D"Comic Sans MS">patch</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">to keep </FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic =
Sans MS">the=20
7.05 BIOS from logging into FAT32 </FONT><FONT=20
face=3D"Comic Sans MS">partitions</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">is a </FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans =
MS">useful=20
saftey net.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">If I use a PC with a flash BIOS that =
supports=20
LBA </FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">hard</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">drives, </FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic =
Sans MS">what=20
does this 4th solution offer that the </FONT><FONT=20
face=3D"Comic Sans MS">former</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">doesn't?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">I assume it limits one to using a =
single OS on=20
</FONT><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">the hard</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">drive?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Since no FAT32 partitions are used =
(or&nbsp;read=20
with the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">binary patch) DR-DOS 7.03 is still =
limited to 2=20
Gb</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">partitions isn't it?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Would this combination of IBMBIO.COM =
files and=20
the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">binary patch mean the evolution of =
DR-DOS 7.03b=20
to</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">DR-DOS 7.03c?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">I for one would like&nbsp;to know more =
about=20
this solution and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">the binary patch also.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Thank you,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">John&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C26253.20052190--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019