X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to opendos-bounces using -f
X-Spam-Filter:	check_local AT panther DOT unisys DOT com DOT br by digitalanswers.org
Message-ID:	<00cc01c19631$6838c780$0300a8c0@alain-nb>
From:	"Alain" <alainm AT pobox DOT com>
To:	<opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: on a related note
Date:	Sat, 5 Jan 2002 19:17:55 -0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

one trick is to allocate a lot of big variables in the autoexec
and clear them when you want space:

In the Autoexec:
SET JUNK1=12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
SET JUNK2=12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
SET JUNK3=12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890

in your batch file:
SET JUNK1=
SET JUNK2=
SET JUNK3=

Ahh.. and don't forget inyour config.sys to allocate enough environment.

Explanation: When you create a new shell, DOS allocates only little
extra space in the environment.

BTW: don't forget the maximum line length of 127 characters!!

Alain

-----Original Message-----
From: DONALD PEDDER <jims_son AT jedi DOT apana DOT org DOT au>
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Saturday, January 05, 2002 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: on a related note


>> SET PAR1=%1
>> SET PAR2=%2
>> SHIFT
>> SHIFT
>
>   Yes, this has ALMOST solved my problem. :-) :-(
>
>   I have 25 parameters to pass to the batch file, which then recursively
>calls my pascal program with different parameters each time. I was able to
>do up to 9 in a single batch file with no problem.
>
>   I tried using this approach to set 25 environment variables, and I got
>"out of environment space" after the 8th. The thing is, I was able to
>MANULLY set these variables, and after I've set them MANUALLY, the batch
>file will work, but with a clean sheet to start with, the batch file only
>allocates a certain number before it hits this problem.
>
>   Thinking things might be happenning too fast when run as batch, I put
>some gaps between them, but it still failed. I also broke it up into
>separate batch files of 8 each, and it still failed after the first one.
>
>   I can't understand why the batch file allocations are failing when I
>have no trouble doing it manually (and the bacth file then works after
>they've been manually created).
>
>   Any ideas?
>
>   I've started looking around the web for some batch-file sites (given
>the lack of documentation with DR-DOS), but I think this would be a rather
>unusual problem. It's probably because I have MS-DOS on the laptop. ;-)
>
>Thanks,
>  dp.
>
>
>

- Raw text -