Message-ID:	<01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A455A6C8@emwatent02.meters.com.au>
From:	"da Silva, Joe" <Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com>
To:	"'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: DEBUG issues (Was: Re: more on the batch file problem)
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:01:55 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id TAA29894
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

Please see below ...

Joe.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Arkady V.Belousov [SMTP:ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su]
> Sent:	Friday, August 17, 2001 6:26 PM
> To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject:	Re: DEBUG issues (Was: Re: more on the batch file problem)
> 
> X-Comment-To: Matthias Paul
> 
> Hi!
> 
> 16-αΧΗ-2001 13:32 Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de (Matthias Paul) wrote
> to
> <opendos AT delorie DOT com>:
> 
> >>>>         mov [100],byte 0
> >>>>         mov word [100],0
> MP> You are right, this is rejected by DR-DOS DEBUG, although
> MP> according to the error message it seems that it be supported.
> MP> I will look into this when I find the time. Thanks for reporting.
> 
>      Also, as reported by Joe da Silva, DEBUG requires additional empty
> line
> if last line in code contains comment.
> 
	[Joe da Silva]  

	To clarify : a blank line in a DEBUG script *should*
	terminate assembly mode ("a" command) ...
	However, with the DR-DOS version there is a bug,
	such that *two* blank lines are required to exit
	assembly mode, if the last assembly statement
	includes a comment.

> >>> See NWDOSTIP.TXT (MPDOSTIP.ZIP) for details.
> >> Full URL, plz.
> MP> As always, see my signature:
> [...]
> 
>      Ok, I look at this.
> 
> >> PS: Matthias, do you will run my script which I already
> >> send to you? :)
> MP> ??? My last reply to <ark AT mos DOT ru> bounced several times,
> MP> I only received an empty email which contained an UUCP
> MP> error message, but my queries what has happened bounced as well.
> 
	[Joe da Silva]  

	This is a recent problem (hey, it's not just me!;-).

	When you reply to an e-mail from Arkady, the e-mail
	address becomes "ark AT mos DOT ru", which *used* to
	work, but now just seems to bounce. OTOH, if you
	send to "ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su" instead, this
	does work. So, maybe the e-mail header has a "from"
	field and a "reply to" field, which are different? If so,
	then there is a problem with the "reply  to" field.

>      May you resend me reports? Also, try to write at direct address (see
> >From field).
> 
> MP> Have you changed your email? Please send the
> MP> script again as private mail.
> 
>      Ok, slightly later. I add support for identification multiply IRQs at
> one COM port.

- Raw text -