Mail Archives: opendos/2001/06/06/04:37:36
BTW, does your stubbed executable run OK with Stacker, etc.,
or does it have the same problem as the STUBIT program?
Also, does the STUBIT program run better for you with compression
disabled ("-nowfse" option)?
Joe.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: da Silva, Joe
> Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:12 PM
> To: 'opendos AT delorie DOT com'
> Subject: RE: New DOS stuff - WDOSX 0.96
>
> No, that's not good compatibility! :-(
>
> Like I said, I have used 3 DOSes with their own EMM386, no
> problem. In your case, perhaps you need to configure QEMM
> a bit differently or use EMM386. I don't know what the problem
> with Stacker might be ... :-(
>
> Joe.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arkady V.Belousov [SMTP:ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su]
> Sent: Friday, 1 June 2001 11:14
> To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: RE: New DOS stuff - WDOSX 0.96
>
> X-Comment-To: da Silva, Joe
>
> Hi!
>
> 1-éÀÎ-2001 09:41 Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com (da Silva, Joe) wrote
> to
> "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>:
>
> dJ> I've never used QEMM and have no access to it, to try it. What I
> dJ> have heard about QEMM is mostly good, so it's probably not the
> dJ> problem. OTOH, it is more "aggressive" in re-allocating upper
> dJ> memory space, so you might have a subtle conflict with your
> dJ> PC. Try using a more conservative configuration, first. Even
> better,
> dJ> try just HIMEM.SYS (no QEMM or EMM386) to see if this makes
> dJ> a difference. If you still can't stub your executable, send me a
> dJ> copy by direct e-mail (not to the list, of course) and I will
> see if
> dJ> I can "stub" it ...
>
> I trie some configration:
>
> 1. Plain (F5) with no Stacker (its executable renamed), no QEMM
> 2. Plain (F5) with Stacker
> 3. Normal - with QEMM (but without Stacker)
> 4. Normal - with all programs loaded
>
> STUBIT runs only in first configuration. This is not very good
> "compatability indication".
- Raw text -