Mail Archives: opendos/2001/06/01/00:10:24
No, that's not good compatibility! :-(
Like I said, I have used 3 DOSes with their own EMM386, no
problem. In your case, perhaps you need to configure QEMM
a bit differently or use EMM386. I don't know what the problem
with Stacker might be ... :-(
Joe.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arkady V.Belousov [SMTP:ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su]
> Sent: Friday, 1 June 2001 11:14
> To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: RE: New DOS stuff - WDOSX 0.96
>
> X-Comment-To: da Silva, Joe
>
> Hi!
>
> 1-éÀÎ-2001 09:41 Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com (da Silva, Joe) wrote to
> "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>:
>
> dJ> I've never used QEMM and have no access to it, to try it. What I
> dJ> have heard about QEMM is mostly good, so it's probably not the
> dJ> problem. OTOH, it is more "aggressive" in re-allocating upper
> dJ> memory space, so you might have a subtle conflict with your
> dJ> PC. Try using a more conservative configuration, first. Even better,
> dJ> try just HIMEM.SYS (no QEMM or EMM386) to see if this makes
> dJ> a difference. If you still can't stub your executable, send me a
> dJ> copy by direct e-mail (not to the list, of course) and I will see if
> dJ> I can "stub" it ...
>
> I trie some configration:
>
> 1. Plain (F5) with no Stacker (its executable renamed), no QEMM
> 2. Plain (F5) with Stacker
> 3. Normal - with QEMM (but without Stacker)
> 4. Normal - with all programs loaded
>
> STUBIT runs only in first configuration. This is not very good
> "compatability indication".
- Raw text -