To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Comment-To:	"da Silva, Joe" <Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com>
References:	<01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A455A64C AT emwatent02 DOT meters DOT com DOT au>
Message-Id:	<2.07b7.MPOH.GE88QO@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Fri, 1 Jun 2001 05:13:36 +0400 (MSD)
Organization:	Locus
X-Mailer:	dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7]
Subject:	RE: New DOS stuff - WDOSX 0.96
Lines:	26
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from 8bit to quoted-printable by postbox.mos.ru id f511Exc05541
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id VAA22851
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

X-Comment-To: da Silva, Joe

Hi!

1-éÀÎ-2001 09:41 Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com (da Silva, Joe) wrote to
"'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>:

dJ> I've never used QEMM and have no access to it, to try it. What I
dJ> have heard about QEMM is mostly good, so it's probably not the
dJ> problem. OTOH, it is more "aggressive" in re-allocating upper
dJ> memory space, so you might have a subtle conflict with your
dJ> PC. Try using a more conservative configuration, first. Even better,
dJ> try just HIMEM.SYS (no QEMM or EMM386) to see if this makes
dJ> a difference. If you still can't stub your executable, send me a
dJ> copy by direct e-mail (not to the list, of course) and I will see if
dJ> I can "stub" it ...

     I trie some configration:

1. Plain (F5) with no Stacker (its executable renamed), no QEMM
2. Plain (F5) with Stacker
3. Normal - with QEMM (but without Stacker)
4. Normal - with all programs loaded

STUBIT runs only in first configuration. This is not very good
"compatability indication".

- Raw text -