Message-ID:	<3ADF7874.E9C574B0@pysmatic.net>
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:44:52 -0700
From:	Neal <lbneal AT pysmatic DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.08 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: DOS issues #2
References:	<200104191133 DOT HAA09260 AT delorie DOT com> <3ADF3730 DOT B0683029 AT cornell DOT edu>
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

Alan -

If MS-DOG is so good, why are you on the DR-DOS list ???

Neal
http://dosonly.com/
====


Alan S. wrote:
> 
> I guess I'm a little confused--  Aside from specialized needs for (say)
> embedded platforms, why are we looking for another NEW non Microsoft
> DOS? and what functionality would/should it have that is not already
> present in, e.g., the OS/2 DOS emulator? [which I frequently see
> remaindered in California for about $4.95 per copy of OS/2 version 2x.]
> 
> Alan S.
> 4-19-2001
>

- Raw text -