To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Comment-To:	"White Dragon" <white DOT dragon AT tin DOT it>
References:	<01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A4021F69 AT emwatent02 DOT meters DOT com DOT au>
	<2 DOT 07b7 DOT 6TV7 DOT G8UNM3 AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
	<00b301c09840$2912ca00$7cbfabd4 AT whitedragon>
Message-Id:	<2.07b7.P5HL.G8VBUW@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:04:08 +0300 (MSK)
Organization:	Locus
X-Mailer:	dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7]
Subject:	Re: Max. drive letter, etc. (was Hard Disk 20gb and dos)
Lines:	17
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

X-Comment-To: White Dragon

Hi!

16-ζΕΧ-2001 18:17 white DOT dragon AT tin DOT it (White Dragon) wrote to
<opendos AT delorie DOT com>:

>>      This depends from what you see. BIOS INT 13 accepts HD's number from
>> 80h to FFh (i.e. 128). On the other side, IDE supports only four devices,
>> whereas SCSI support 7-15 devices in chain (and how many SCSI cards you may
>> add at mainboards?).
WD> why have a 128 devices system, while you can have a raid system seen as 1
WD> disk?

     This is another story - source question ask how to number all disk
_which me see_. If RAID controller presents many disks as one disk then this
is not raises source question.

- Raw text -