Mail Archives: opendos/2001/02/14/18:23:05
Answer : Because at least one of his drives, ie. the 4X
CD-ROM, is most likely to *pre-date* the ATAPI standard
and is therefore unlikely to comply with it!
Please do not confuse the ATA standard(s) with the
ATAPI standard, although they have now merged
somewhat. The ATAPI standard was developed much
later (and by a different group) than the ATA standard.
Furthermore, it is quite possible that what we see
in this instance is simply a bug in the software, be
it NWCDEX or the "Player" software (which may
assume that only one CD-ROM-like drive exists,
and ignore the second drive).
Joe.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Moran [SMTP:pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2001 3:48
> To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "da Silva, Joe" <Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com>
> To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1:59 AM
> Subject: RE: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX
>
>
> > The problem with IDE CD-ROMs (don't know anything about
> > ZIP and LS-120) is that the manufacturers started "adapting"
> > IDE (ATA) to "make it happen", since the ATA standard had
> > only been intended for hard disks! So in the beginning was
> > chaos, with different manufacturers doing their own thing,
> > until common-sense prevailed and the various parties got
> > together to formulate the ATAPI standard (to suit such devices
> > as CD-ROM and tape drives). Since then, compatibility has
> > improved enormously, which is why it is now possible for
> > the BIOS itself to recognize and communicate (eg. boot
> > from) an ATAPI (aka. IDE) CD-ROM.
>
> I don't mean to be cruel here, but if the so-called ATAPI STANDARD is so
> standard they why is Utz having problems with two APATI devices?
>
----- snip -----
- Raw text -