delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-ID: | <3A89A82B.A394D78E@compuserve.de> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:33:31 +0100 |
From: | Utz Zarwell <UtzZarwell AT compuserve DOT de> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.7 [de]C-CCK-MCD CSO 1.0 (Win98; I) |
X-Accept-Language: | de,en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | opendos AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: nwcdex and two drives |
Reply-To: | opendos AT delorie DOT com |
on 10 Feb 2001 Bernie <bernie AT mbox302 DOT swipnet DOT se> wrote: >>the faster drives (HDD and CDRW) should >>run with the EIDE channel and the slower >>drives with the second (IDE) channel. >I wasn't aware of a diffrence between them. If you use >a (really old) computer without EIDE on the motherboard >then I can understand if there's a diffrence. There is a difference in throughput between the EIDE and the IDE channel onboard. >I wasn't even aware of a program that could use a IDE >(which means in my experience that it's junk) CD-R in DOS. At Daves site there are pointers. Have a look at http://www.opus.co.tt/dave/index.htm >Any experience with burning CDs in DOS would be appreciated. I did not use any. Theres no sense in using a 256MB Partition and a 420MB HDD full of stuff for CD writing in DOS. Regards, Utz
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |