delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: opendos/2001/01/30/01:10:26

X-Apparently-From: <pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <045601c08a82$e98939c0$91a63bc6@dbcooper>
From: "Patrick Moran" <pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
References: <01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A4021F12 AT emwatent02 DOT meters DOT com DOT au>
Subject: Re: TGZ compression (was Greed, nee DPMS info)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:07:18 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Da Silva, Joe" <Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 9:55 PM
Subject: RE: TGZ compression (was Greed, nee DPMS info)


> Thanks.
>
> Note however, that the possible "large file" problem is with UNTGZ,

A long, long time ago, DoSLinux which was called DILINUX back then was
distributed using .tgz and came with UNTGZ. It was about 9MB is size
compressed. I had no problem unzipping the file and installing DOSLinux
with it.

> *not* GZIP. The problem I had with GZIP was that (from memory) :
> 1. It has a nasty habit of overwriting the source file.

That is not a nasty habit. GZIP is designed to do this. However, if you
wish to keep the source file you can give it instructions to do so. I
never bothered doing that.

> 2. It doesn't seem to handle LFN's within archives properly.

That could be. I neber tried to use it with LFNs in DOS. I do that in
Linux. But I have all kinds of problems with LHNs period.

> 3. It's documentation sux.

This could also be, because it was probably just proted over to DoS from
Linux with some of the stuff rewritten like using the \ that DOS uses
instead of the industry startdard / for subdirectories. I don't find
them to be bad because I used it in Linux and looked at the DOCs for DOS
too see what can and cannot be done with the DOS version. Usually I just
use the -h or --help screens for reference and seldom use the manual.
Much the same as I do with PKZIP. For example you use -9 for the best
compression with GZIP and use -x with PKZIP. Much of it is just like
PKZIP and PKZIP probably came from GZIP anyway as far as the commands
go. I don't use ARJ very much and sometimes I have to refer to it's
manual to figure out things that I normally do with my eyes closed with
PKZIP. Probably the recursing of directories is the hardest part to
understand because PKZIP is very different from all the others I have
used, except of course PKXARC and PKPAK. I have to always look that up
when using ARJ, LHARC, GZIP and many others because I am so used to
using PKZIP.

Pat





_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019