delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: opendos/2000/12/25/06:42:42

To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Comment-To: Jim Stevenson <jims AT eos DOT arc DOT nasa DOT gov>
References: <200012251106 DOT eBPB6YA12342 AT eos DOT arc DOT nasa DOT gov>
Message-Id: <2.07b7.ONXD.G64GAO@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:37:36 +0300 (MSK)
Organization: Locus
X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7]
Subject: Re: Dos future?
Lines: 21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

X-Comment-To: Jim Stevenson

Hi!

25-δΕΛ-2000 03:06 jims AT eos DOT arc DOT nasa DOT gov (Jim Stevenson) wrote to
opendos AT delorie DOT com:

JS> This post is impossible to read with speech.

     Of course. There was not natural, but technical/computer language.

JS> If you quote me, please put your comments first.
JS> I have already listened to mine.

     But you forget about _all other_ peoples, which have many other
information sources and not obliged to remember who write for whom and what
was written early. How many peoples may remember which letter cause this
your another public complain (hint: this was letter with batch file quote)?

     Why you not compalin for "screen readers" producers/vendors about its
programs lacks? Why you instead hate and tire other peoples?

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019