X-Apparently-From:	<pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<002401c05b80$55ad0dc0$fc881004@dbcooper>
From:	"Patrick Moran" <pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com>
To:	<opendos AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<200011301449 DOT JAA22421 AT xellos DOT bignet DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Optimizing CONFIG.SYS...
Date:	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 03:14:22 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

He is not talking about LEND, he is talking about DELAYED writes. i.e.
DELAY=

Pat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark at Cross+Road's" <mark1 AT mich DOT com>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Cc: <PAUL-MA AT reze-1 DOT rz DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Optimizing CONFIG.SYS...


>
> On 2000-11-24 opendos AT delorie DOT com said:
>  op>On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 Patrick Moran wrote:
>  op>> >  VERIFY off
>  op>> >  DEVICEHIGH=NWCACHE ... /LEND=ON /DELAY=5000 /FLUSH=ON
>  op>> [...]
>  op>> I have not noticed that much increase in speed.
>  op>Oh, there really is a drastic increase when you often write data.
>  op>But you also need VERIFY to be disabled, because NWCACHE cannot
>  op>delay any writes, when it is left on.
>
>
> *Isn't according to this configuration the verify disabled?
> Or is there another choice for verify other than being "off" to disable
it?
> Or do you mean no verify line at all?  I've used lend-=on and verify on
both
> together.  Do you also indicate that  this does slow the system when both
> being used together or just the delay with the verify?
>
>         Thanks,
>        Mark
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

- Raw text -