Mail Archives: opendos/2000/11/24/17:59:09.1
Message-ID: | <005d01c05665$a0c62640$0400000a@alain-nb>
|
From: | "Alain" <alainm AT pobox DOT com>
|
To: | <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
|
Subject: | Re: Optimizing CONFIG.SYS...
|
Date: | Fri, 24 Nov 2000 20:22:43 -0200
|
MIME-Version: | 1.0
|
X-Priority: | 3
|
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal
|
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
|
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
|
Reply-To: | opendos AT delorie DOT com
|
Alain wrote:
> A> I made a small program to automatically set or change the FILES=100
> A> command in the CONFIG.SYS file. When it finds the command and it is
> A> smaller than 100, it is changed to 100; this works ok. The problem
is
> A> happening when the command is _not_ present in small files that do
not
> A> have the [COMMON] line and that do not have OPTION. I am adding the
Arkady Belousov wrote:
AB> What is "OPTION"?
Sorry I, I meant [MENU].
>
> A> command in the _first_ line and Windows98 doesn't recognize it if I
boot
> A> only in dos mode.
AB> If you mean "Safe mode command prompt" then in this mode both
AB>CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT are ignored. If you mean "Command prompt"
or
AB>"BootGUI=0" in MSDOS.SYS then FILES position in CONFIG.SYS when no
[COMMON]
AB>section presented have no significance.
I meant exacly Command prompt" or "BootGUI=0".
AB> When sections presented then FILES position have no significance
in
AB>[COMMON]+selected section.
I am having problems only in small Config.sys files (usualy the one
created automaticaly by Windows 95/98). I believe that it was never
tested
with bigger configs, either because the files statements was already
present and was then changed without moving, or because it just didn't
happen!
> A> Can somebody tell me if it can be safely and allways put after the
last
> A> line or if it should be after or before some other command?
AB> AFIAR, when you execute CONFIG.SYS step by step then DOS show
you in
AB>which order it accepts CONFIG.SYS statements. Unlike DR-DOS in MS-DOS
only
AB>DEVICE statements order have significance.
Since it is happening, (4 or 5 times in different machines), can you
suggest
anything?
Alain
- Raw text -