To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Comment-To:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
References:	<2 DOT 07b7 DOT R3QH DOT G4HZDW AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Message-Id:	<2.07b7.O6D5.G4IXC9@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Fri, 24 Nov 2000 13:04:57 +0300 (MSK)
Organization:	Locus
X-Mailer:	dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7]
Subject:	Re: Bad work
Lines:	56
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

X-Comment-To: Arkady V.Belousov

Hi!

24-ξΟΡ-2000 00:51 ark (Arkady V.Belousov) wrote to opendos AT delorie DOT com:

AB>      What the h*ll? Than farther than bigger time gap on the Delorie list...
AB> For example, previous letter I send 23/11 22:43 and up to now (24/11 0:48) I
AB> not receive copy of it. Previous letters also resended with very long gap.
AB> Interesting, how many gap will be for this letter?
AB>      Someone know how to contact with list manager?

     Well. Step by step:

>Received: from muhost.UUCP (uumuhost AT localhost)
>        by relay1.mos.ru (8.9.0/8.9.0) with UUCP id AAA22642
>        for delorie.com!opendos; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 00:43:08 +0300 (MSK)

     Delorie get letter at 23/11 21:43GMT.

>Received: from relay1.mos.ru (root AT localhost)
>        by delorie.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA08899
>        for <opendos AT delorie DOT com>; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 16:56:53 -0500
>Received: (from daemon AT localhost)
>        by delorie.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA00434
>        for opendos-list; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 18:56:57 -0500

     Then opendos-list receive letter after 2 (two!) hours (23/11 23:56GMT).

>Received: from delorie.com (delorie.com [207.22.48.162])
>        by relay1.mos.ru (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA24910
>        for <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 02:46:22 +0300 (MSK)

     Then letter returned at the same time, after 2 hour gap, excluding 10
min difference (look like Delorie not synchronize it servers timer with
external sources).

     This happens for letter with "Bad work" subject. Now look what happens
with originally discussed letter with subject "Re: Optimizing
CONFIG.SYS...".

>Received: from muhost.UUCP (uumuhost AT localhost)
>        by relay1.mos.ru (8.9.0/8.9.0) with UUCP id WAA18525
>        for delorie.com!opendos; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 22:37:09 +0300 (MSK)
>Received: from relay1.mos.ru (root AT localhost)
>        by delorie.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA16300
>        for <opendos AT delorie DOT com>; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:51:03 -0500
>Received: (from daemon AT localhost)
>        by delorie.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA00579
>        for opendos-list; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 18:57:40 -0500
>Received: from delorie.com (delorie.com [207.22.48.162])
>        by relay1.mos.ru (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA28941
>        for <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>; Fri, 24 Nov 2000 04:52:38 +0300 (MSK)

     As you can see this letter have 6 (six!) hours of time gap! And come
latter than previous letter...

- Raw text -