delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: opendos/2000/11/03/13:23:27

Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 10:22:59 -0800
From: "Cox, Stuart FOR:EX" <Stuart DOT Cox AT gems1 DOT gov DOT bc DOT ca>
Subject: RE: A little history
To: "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Message-id: <DD5711D5247CD4118B280008C791400609E4C0@sharp.itsd.gov.bc.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id NAA25257
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

CP/M V3.0 for the Z-80 allowed redirection. It wasn't quite transparent, but
it did it.



Stuart Cox
Map Generalization Technician, not
Resources Inventory Branch
······················································
Phone: (250)387-5529
FAX: (250)356-9430
email Stuart DOT Cox AT gems1 DOT gov DOT bc DOT ca
Check out the RIB Website at:
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/resinv/homepage.htm



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Simmonds [mailto:chris AT 2net DOT co DOT uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 10:58 AM
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: A little history


Hi Patrick,

Thanks for the detail. Great.

I think that Kildall was dead before DRI was bought by Novell. I don't think
he
could ever have been a second Bill Gates though - he just wasn't like that.
He
had a life - though short. I don't think Gates has ever had a life.

Patrick Moran wrote:

> It most likely was in the developement of DOS v2 that the UNIX connection
> was implemented. I do somewhat like to distort it a little and say
> UNIX->CP/M->DOS=>Linux, just to show we are making a complete circle and
> back to where it all started from. It is only slightly exaggerated, but
not
> too far from the truth. It is more like a U-turn than a circle, but it
just
> looks better as a circle<grin>.
>

I take issue here. There is no connection between CP/M and Unix. MS-DOS post
v2.0 has a sort of Unixy file system and sort of does redirection and piping
which were obviously inspired by Unix (Xenix?), but its very superficial.
I'm
sure there never was any common code between MS-DOS and Xenix. For one
thing,
one is written in assembler, the other in 'C'. So your circle is more of a
line:

CP/M -> DOS -> Windows

I see Unix as a totaly separate line.

Chris.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019