X-Sent:	1 Nov 2000 02:06:53 GMT
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 21:06:51 -0500 (EST)
From:	Mark Tucker <tuckerm AT tucker DOT net>
X-Sender:	tuckerm AT oog
To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Overclocking, Linux issues: was Re: About Micro$quash...
In-Reply-To:	<012401c0437f$76687a40$8b8a1004@dbcooper>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.21.0010311908080.29225-100000@oog>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	Mark Tucker <tuckerm AT sd2 DOT mailbank DOT com>
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> The ads I got in snail mail from DEC a few tears ago only had VMS and NT as
> listed options for OS. Maybe later they offered other OSes or maybe it was
> special orderfor the other OSes. This was for the Alpha AXP (APX?) You could
> also get a plug-in Pentium card for it to run MS crap if you wanted it.

I don't know to whom and how DEC marketed the Alpha but I've seen and
worked on more OSF/DEC Unix boxes than NT and VMS combined.  I'm not sure
what the lineage of DEC unix is but it seemed to be quite similar to
Ultrix from the VAX days (yes, VMS was not the only option on the VAX
either).

As a side note, NT on the Alpha was surprisingly good - the x86 port
couldn't hold a candle to it in terms of stability or speed.

What does this have to do with DR-DOS?  I don't know anymore.

+======================+
| Mark Tucker          |
| mark AT tucker DOT net      |
+======================+

- Raw text -