X-Apparently-From:	<pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<001301c041bf$4876fb50$6f1e0404@dbcooper>
From:	"Patrick Moran" <pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com>
To:	<opendos AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<E13ov6o-0000Fg-00 AT seasip DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: Overclocking, Linux issues: was Re: About Micro$quash...
Date:	Sat, 28 Oct 2000 17:36:43 -0600
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

Hi John,

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Elliott" <jce AT seasip DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: Overclocking, Linux issues: was Re: About Micro$quash...


>   What Bill said about Windows NT in 1993 doesn't necessarily translate to
> how it turned out - any more than DOS converged with XENIX. Maybe what he
> was referring to was the gutless POSIX subsystem in NT. There's only one
> use I've found for that, and that is creating hard links.

>   In fact, apart from the fact that is isn't Unix, it's the most popular
> form of Unix ever :-) For a popular Unix that actually _is_ Unix, you'd
> probably want to look at MacOS X.

Gee, I wonder if Desqview X would qualify? After all it is X based!!!!!!!-:)

Pat



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- Raw text -