Message-ID:	<004501c04134$c9633200$11fea8c0@dell>
From:	"Ben A L Jemmett" <ben DOT jemmett AT ukonline DOT co DOT uk>
To:	<opendos AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<20001026 DOT 023925 DOT -12411 DOT 0 DOT domanspc AT juno DOT com> <00e901c0412c$fb9c8800$a2881004 AT dbcooper>
Subject:	Re: Overclocking, Linux issues: was Re: About Micro$quash...
Date:	Sun, 29 Oct 2000 00:13:49 +0100
Organization:	Jemmett Glover Software Development
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

> Wonder why MS developed XENIX??????????????????-:)-:)-:)-:)
Well, they did develop Xenix before NT, and unfortunately from this they got
their copyrights on some commercial 'real' Unices - I think it was Solaris
or SCO, in one of the text filters.  'more' I think.  Uhr, I'm waffling.
Excuse me.

> Does anyone have any 1.x versions of GEM?
It's only a Google away...  Try somewhere within http://cpm.interfun.net/ or
inside http://www.deltasoft.com/ -
http://www.deltasoft.com/downloads-gemworld.htm lists it.  However, I don't
think it's worth the hassle - GEM/1 maxed out at EGA, resolution-wise, and
only offers slight advantages over GEM/2 and up (the Desktop is mainly
better in GEM/1, and the window frames are different).

If you want a GEM system, it's probably better to try out FreeGEM (that's on
the Deltasoft URL again) - it's got some new features, it looks more modern,
it's more customisable and it's GPLed as well.

Regards,
Ben A L Jemmett.
(http://web.ukonline.co.uk/ben.jemmett/, http://www.deltasoft.com/)

- Raw text -