delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: opendos/2000/09/26/12:07:03

Message-Id: <200009261601.MAA12022@xellos.bignet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
From: "Mark at Cross+Road's" <mark1 AT mich DOT com>
CC: <alainm AT pobox DOT com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 12:01:29 +0400
X-Mailer: Net-Tamer 1.12.0
Subject: Re: DRDOS FDISK
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

Hello Alainm,
     I wasn't calling Msdos trash I was speaking of the condition that the
data on the shared drives would be in if both O-S's accessed that same
specific drive.  Anyways, I think you misunderstood my use of "trash".  It
seems that at least one person remarked that they were successfully sharing
the drives with both Ms and Dr-dos's so it's still a little unclear but
perhaps it's not worth the hassle to try adding Ms dos to a Drdos system?
     TAke care,
      Mark


On 2000-09-25 opendos AT delorie DOT com said:
   >>Does this mean then that if you had a drive with Drdos #703
   >>operating and used a bootmanger to install msdos 6.22 the
   >partitions set-up by Drdos could
   >>likely become trashed when booting to msdos and read/write on
   >>those same shared drives?
   >This is not the first time I hear about this problem. THIS IS A BUG.
   >It's no point calling M$-DOS trash or crap, one thing _every_ OS
   >should do is respect other OSes..
   >Alain

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019