Message-Id:	<SAK.2000.01.16.pseroftk@fernande>
Date:	Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:57:44 -0500
X-Priority:	3
From:	Chad Fernandez <fernande AT internet1 DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mail Warrior
To:	"opendos AT delorie DOT com" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: [Re: Possible DR-DOS enhancements]
X-Mailer-Version:	v3.55
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

1/16/00 2:09:10 PM

Okay so now I am really confused!

Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA

robert w moss-> 1/16/00 9:15:52 AM ->
>The latest version I have Open Linux 2.2 which was included in a QUE 
>Book, 'Using Open Linux v2.2 , (including  Netscape, KDE, 
>WordPerfect 8, LIZARD, Partition Magic, Boot Magic, with whatever 
>Caldera had worked on at that time, I guess).  And I also have v1.3 
>which was included in a Que Book, 'The Complete Idiots guide to using 
>Linux, (also including Star office,and KDE, and RPM).
>
>I get the following from my reading in QUE v2.2 book: 
>Since Caldera started out with Red Hat v2.1 in its Caldera Network
>Desktop
>and Red Hat used Caldera's money in its RPM packaging, which was also
>used by Caldera, there is a little confusion as to what is used by each 
>company.  Red Hat still uses the RPM packaging and desktop stuff from 
>the old days and linuxconf along with a window manager called fvwm95, 
>but Caldera has stopped using that RPM stuff (?) and is now using a 
>character based , all-in-one system called LISA.  This may be why the
>major
>magazines evaluators say that Caldera is using Red Hat's distribution.
>I have read several recent Linux Evaluations in the Linux magazines which
>mention
>Caldera using the Red Hat distributions in their latest commercial
>versions (2.3).
> They also throw in Star Office and BRU in the commercial versions.
>
>It's food for thought though. Who is really doing what??
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Bob 'DOMAN' Moss 
>*"Remember, if you don't have chocolate*
>* you don't have food"!!!!..........................*

- Raw text -