delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
To: | opendos AT delorie DOT com |
Organization: | Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and |
Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Science | |
Message-Id: | <AAhGdPtOq4@insect.mail.iephb.ru> |
From: | pavel AT insect DOT mail DOT iephb DOT ru (Pavel V. Ozerski) |
Date: | Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:41:31 +0400 (MSD) |
X-Mailer: | dMail [Demos Mail for Windows NT v1.4b1] |
Subject: | Again about NTFS problem. |
Lines: | 11 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | opendos AT delorie DOT com |
I understand that HIMEM.SYS bug is very important but I would remember about an another problem. I (and not only I) use DR-DOS as 'first aid system' on Windows NT computer. Since I converted one logical disk to NTFS I cannot see this disk from DR-DOS. I understand that NTFS support is too complex to be the part of DR-DOS. The problem is another: I cannot use the popular NTFSDOS driver that must allow to read NTFS disks from DOS. The answer of one from two authors of this TSR, Mark Russinovich, is: "You failed to read the requirements: NTFSDOS Requires MS DOS 5 or higher". Well, but DR-DOS claims to be fully compatible with MS-DOS 6! But really it has therefore some important differences! My question: what are these differences? If DR-DOS does not understand some DOS API functions or interrupts, I think, there are no problems to write a small driver or TSR to make the interface between NTFSDOS and DR-DOS.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |