delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: opendos/1999/06/10/03:45:48

Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 17:45:22 +0100
From: Matthias Paul <PAUL-MA AT reze-1 DOT rz DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Subject: Re: DRDOS 7.03 loading XMS-driver now wastes memory
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <825E27215A@reze-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de>
Organization: Rechenzentrum RWTH Aachen
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 07 Jun 1999 Utz Zarwell wrote:

IMHO parts of your configuration are rather unusual. Anyway, running 
a quick test I too could reproduce the phenomenon on an AMD486DX40 
(SIS 461 chipset, VESA-Local bus, AMI-BIOS 1993 I5 R1.3, 20 Mb RAM) 
running DR-DOS 7.03 and temporarily loading MS-DOS 6.22 HIMEM.SYS... 
So, it appears not to be CPU or chipset specific at all.

Still, a number of comments and questions might help to better 
clarify your setup in general:

>ok, at first for DR-OpenDOS 7.02 with PC DOS 7 HIMEM.SYS
>[...]
>DEVICE=C:\START\DOA20.EXE /C /D /Q
>DEVICE=C:\START\UEBDA.SYS /S=4C /F

Are these self-written drivers for A20 control and moving the
Extended BIOS data area? Selfwritten?

>DEVICE=C:\START\HIMEM.SYS /V /FASTA20
>DEVICE=C:\DOS\DPMS.EXE

Is this the PC DOS DPMS driver? It has an unusual memory footprint of
1568 bytes quite similar to very old Novell DPMS drivers, which also
found their way into PC DOS due to Stacker. Use the DR-DOS 7.02+ DPMS
driver instead, it should have a smaller footprint of only 944 byte 
on your machine. Since you can't use VLADIVAR multitasking without 
EMM386, you could also try to use Helix's/Network Associates' CLOAKING 
driver instead of DPMS, also provides a "Cloaked DPMS server" (this 
is undocumented) at a (high loadable) memory footprint of ca. 1 Kb.
CLOAKING 2.01 (1994) shipped for example with Logitech MouseWare 6.50
and 6.60, and even current issues of MouseWare 8.2x utilize it to run
the mouse driver in Protected Mode, thereby reducing the visible 
mouse driver footprint downto ca. 1 Kb (instead of 27 Kb otherwise). 
This even outperforms CTMOUSE/DRMOUSE...

>DEVICE=C:\START\UKEY.SYS /DATEI=C:\START\LEBOOK.BIN

Vobis LeBook? Is this a laptop keyboard driver, or a key stuffing 
tool? It has an invalid device driver name "aeoeueAEOEUE(" (maybe to save 
some bytes), but on the other hand this should not cause any problems.

>DEVICE=C:\START\UM8673.SYS
>DEVICE C:\START\SRDXMSS.SYS

I guess, UM8673.SYS (IDE bus master driver) correlates with

 322:0000   UMPCIIDE     1F40h,   8.000    DEVICE = installed device 

and SRDXMSS.SYS (Marko Kohtala's resizable small XMS RAM disk) with

 773:0000         F:      2E0h,     736    DEVICE = installed device 

But where does the other block driver come from? 

 24B:0000         E:       B0h,     176    DEVICE = installed device 

I can't find a line loading something like DRIVER.SYS or another RAM 
disk... Or is this a result of DOA20.EXE?!?

Since your memory configuration is rather modular, it might be 
interesting to see what happens after removing the bus master driver 
and XBDA relocator. Even if they worked, they could cause some fuzz...

>[...]
> experimenting a little using my old dummy device driver,
>insert DEVICE=DUMMYDRV.SYS /SIZE=1000 before HIMEM.SYS
>and got:
 
 249:0000   DUMDRV &     1000h,   4.096    DEVICE = installed device 
 34A:0000   XMSXXXX0     74F0h,  29.936    DEVICE = installed device 
 A9A:0000   aeoeueAEOEUE('      190h,     400    DEVICE = installed device 
                              +  ======
                                 34.432 bytes @ 249 - A9A

> with DUMMYDRV.SYS /SIZE=4000 I got

 249:0000   DUMDRV &     4000h,  16.384    DEVICE = installed device 
 64A:0000   XMSXXXX0     44F0h,  17.648    DEVICE = installed device 
 A9A:0000   aeoeueAEOEUE('      190h,     400    DEVICE = installed device 
                              +  ======
                                 34.432 bytes @ 249 - A9A
 
> with DUMMYDRV.SYS /SIZE=8000 I got
 
 249:0000   DUMDRV &     8000h,  32.768    DEVICE = installed device 
 A4A:0000   XMSXXXX0      C60h,   3.168    DEVICE = installed device 
 B11:0000   aeoeueAEOEUE('      190h,     400    DEVICE = installed device 
                              +  ======
                                 36.336 bytes @ 249 - B11

>anything strange?
I've never seen this before (but, of course, I'm using EMM386 most 
of the time)... Your dummy driver has proven to be quite useful here. 
You should try a few more configurations between /SIZE=4000..8000 
to see how HIMEM.SYS strikes back when DUMMYDRV.SYS reaches 
700:0000..A00:0000.

Do similar things also happen when HIMEM.SYS is loaded above 
1000:0000 (e.g. by loading multiple DUMMYDRV.SYS), for example 
placing HIMEM.SYS start in between 13xx:0000..1Axx:0000?
Seems like HIMEM.SYS tries to ensure that some part of it is loaded 
at a fixed offset short before A9A. For what reason I don't know. 
On my system a DEBUG dump showed that the memory block occupied by 
HIMEM.SYS still contains most parts of the installer, although there 
are some large areas of 00h and FFh. Same with yours? Could it be, 
that for some reason HIMEM.SYS has problems to run within Low Memory 
(first 64 Kb) due to some obscure A20 or DMA problem??? Although 
this does not appear to be hardware specific, any changes after 
fiddling with CMOS SETUP settings for A20 or chipset setup?

Does the following reveal anything on your machine:

 INSTALL=c:\drdos\mem.exe /AP
 DEVICE=c:\pcdos\himem.sys
 INSTALL=c:\drdos\mem.exe /AP

I know you checked DR-DOS HIMEM.SYS /CHIPSET:xx already, but please 
also check

 DEVICE=c:\pcdos\himem.sys /MACHINE:xx /A20CONTROL:ON|OFF

Unfortunately I don't have the time to track this down myself, but 
if this problem does occur with DR-DOS 7.03 (01/1999) and did not 
occur with DR-OpenDOS 7.02 (12/1997), what about DR-DOS 7.02 (02/1998) 
and all of its various updates over 1998? After isolating the latest 
working kernel for this setup, we should step by step replace 
IBMDOS.COM by newer ones until the problem occurs or we use the 
7.03 BDOS. Then same with IBMBIO.COM. 
With this info, I might be able to isolate the kernel patch that 
apparently causes this behaviour and look for a fix.

>Chipset made by UMC: UM8891N (Notebook), UM8886N EIDE/ISA bridge

>If anyone out there could provide me any good info/datasheet/pointer
>about that particular chipset (programming) really I would be happy
>to spent that time... ;-)

That's an offer!!! OK people, let's search for some data sheets
(I couldn't find any of the UMC chips in INTER60, but what's the
Intel Batman chipset's code number again?)... Anyone checked
UMC's server already?

 Matthias

PS: Some off-topic comments:

>HISHELL SIZE=2160 C:\COMMAND.COM C:\ /E:512 /P /MH

"/P /MH" should be changed to "/MH /P".
For maximum compatibility, /P, /K, or /C should always be the last 
option in the parameter line.

>and now DR-DOS 7.03 with
>[...]
>YESCHAR=J
>TIMEOUT=15,J

You could also tokenize this for more flexibility. This will ensure
that the TIMEOUT default gets auto-aligned whenever you change 
YESCHAR (with a few exceptions tough):

 YESCHAR=Ja ; for German language
 NOCHAR=Nein
 RESUMECHAR=Fortsetzen
 TIMEOUT=15,YESCHAR,1

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthias Paul, Ubierstrasse 28, D-50321 Bruehl, Germany
eMail: <Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Web  : http://www.rhrz.uni-bonn.de/~uzs180/mpdokeng.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019