Message-Id:	<199903120602.AAA14015@crius.flash.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	<opendos AT delorie DOT com>
From:	"Mark @ Cross+Road's" <mwarchol AT flash DOT net>
CC:	<dtwo AT sympatico DOT ca>
Date:	Fri, 12 Mar 1999 01:02:38 +0500
X-Mailer:	Net-Tamer 1.11.2
Subject:	Re: New Computer and DR-DOS(or any DOS)
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

  What is the url and how does it compare to Drdos 702/3?  Do you like it
better?


On 1999-03-11 opendos AT delorie DOT com said:
   >domanspc AT juno DOT com wrote:
   >> Sorry for cutting out so much of you original msg but I am trying
   >>to keep  up with the
   >> latest DOS's available and I hadn't heard of  PC DOS 2000.  I am
   >>running  PC DOS 7, MS DOS 6.22, DR DOS 5, Novell DOS 7.
   >I got PC DOS 2000 right from IBM.  It is basically a fully Y2K
   >compatible version of PC DOS 7.  It seems very stable, and I
   >thought it was worth the price to get rid of MS DOS 6.22!! -Dean
   >Dancey. BTW It was shown on IBM'S website.

- Raw text -