delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: opendos/1998/11/17/15:01:02

Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 16:59:03 +0100
From: Matthias Paul <PAUL-MA AT reze-1 DOT rz DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Subject: Re: More Questions/bugs
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <60A26494096@reze-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de>
Organization: Rechenzentrum RWTH Aachen
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

On 1998-11-10 Mark Aitchison wrote:

>2. Is it possible to change longname behaviour (other than shutting 
>it off completely) so that...
>
>    dir | find "abc" > my.list
>    edit my.list
>
>   does the expected thing (in other words the shortname for 
>   "my.list" should be "my.lis" optionally, especially in batch 
>   files.

Currently not, but I like this suggestion for various reasons.

For compatibility with Windows 95 long filenames, the generated short
filename for a long file name will be truncated using tildes + 
numbers, so the SFN will usually be MY.L~1, MY.L~2, etc., but not 
MY.LIS. Since this is actually stored in the file system, there is no 
reasonable way to achieve a "truncated long file name" like MY.LIS 
afterwards.

However, as long as there are not multiple files with matching SFNs
IMO also it would be more convenient, if LONGNAME would optionally 
(!) generate an SFN by just truncating the LFN, so that the SFN for a 
LFN like MY.LIST would actually be MY.LIS, as Mark suggests. Of 
course, once there are matching SFNs, LONGNAME should again default 
to use the tilde + number method. (BTW. Windows 95 has a registery 
setting to force this behaviour.)

Additionally I'd like to suggest to implement another LONGNAME option 
to reduce junk in the directory entries to a minimum: Optionally 
LONGNAME should generate LFNs only for filenames not fitting in the 
8.3 naming scheme, else it should only generate the SFN directory 
entry, and no LFN storing the case. 

Regarding the question, where to report LFN bugs: Just use the
usual Caldera email address as stated in the README.TXT file 
shipping with the driver and/or DR-DOS.

>3. Why are some system files locked so virus scanners cannot check
>   IBMBIO.COM, etc on *any* drive? (Try running F-PROT).

As far as I see it, using F-PROT (on a DR-DOS 7.03 BETA system with or
without SHARE loaded) this applies to all files which have the Hidden 
and/or System attribute set, not only to the DR-DOS kernel files. I'm 
not sure why this happens, but it is probably due to the method F-
PROT uses to open files. However, it does not occur on the MS-DOS 7 
command prompt. 

Has anyone checked this under MS-DOS 6.22 with and without SHARE 
loaded?

>4. Is TASKMGR able to use a swap file as well as RAM if it isn't in
>   switcher mode?

No, only the task switcher can swap to disk. The multitasker currently
does not provide virtual memory, however it surely would be very 
useful to add this.

 Matthias


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthias Paul, Ubierstrasse 28, D-50321 Bruehl, Germany
eMail: <Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Web  : http://www.rhrz.uni-bonn.de/~uzs180/mpdokeng.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Caldera Digital Research Systems/OpenLinux: http://www.caldera.com/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019