Message-Id:	<7BD626A8132BD211B1F60001FA6A2C5895C7E1@sw720x030.visa.com>
From:	"Braden, Flash" <cbraden AT visa DOT com>
To:	"'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Editor suggestions
Date:	Thu, 22 Oct 1998 17:34:52 -0700
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
Reply-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com

barf, puke, gag.

edln was better than vi

I use kedit.

-Flash->

> ----------
> From: 	Weiqi Gao[SMTP:weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com]
> Sent: 	Thursday, October 22, 1998 5:08 PM
> To: 	opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: 	Re: Editor suggestions
> 
> John Dyer wrote:
> > 
> > Ok guys, please don't flame me, I know the "editor" debate has gone on
> for as
> > long as computers have existed. I was just surprised that the one I
> chose
> > several years ago after looking at so many, still does not seem well
> known.
> > 
> > I won't bore you with a long list of "features", just visit their site,
> > download their demo and see for yourself. I gaurantee you will be
> 'hooked'
> > 
> > Its not shareware but its not expensive either,
> > Its at www.vedit.com
> > 
> > Thanks,
> >         John
> 
> Forget about the editors debate.  Learn vi or EMACS and be done with it.
> 
> --
> Weiqi Gao
> weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com
> 

- Raw text -