To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 16 DOT 19980102214118 DOT 3df70018 AT popd DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
Message-Id:	<AJiYjhqOIU@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Sun, 4 Jan 1998 03:32:44 +0300 (MSK)
Organization:	Locus
Reply-To:	ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject:	Re: Answers!
Lines:	13
MIME-Version:	1.0

X-Comment-To: Flash Braden

Hi!

2-ñÎ×-98 23:42 anathema AT ix21 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com (Flash Braden) wrote to OpenDOS <opendos AT delorie DOT com>:

 > Basic to C translator?  Are you fishing for flames?

     Why not? Why you accept principle of translation from, say, C/C++,
Pascal or BASIC to machine code or ASM, but astonished by translation to
another _universal_ language (which allow to build virtual machine through
library's set of functions, as for Pascal to C converters, to builtin
interpreter, as for SQL to C converter) from any other language?

- Raw text -