Sender:	villani AT server1 DOT iop DOT com
Message-ID:	<34A3A1C4.167E@iop.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Dec 1997 07:23:32 -0500
From:	Pat Villani <patv AT iop DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	ark AT mos DOT ru
CC:	fd-dev AT list DOT freedos DOT org, opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Kernel status (was interesting phenomenon and Super Improved Freedos?)
References:	<34A10B3A DOT 1CFB AT iop DOT com> <AB5CMeqO9P AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>

Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>      As result, I must say: DOS is bad in terms of _expansion_ becuase
> 16-bit model and ugly design. I think, redesigned DOS be (and must?) have a
> likeness with original Unixes (like Linux, may be). But, if we talk about
> current state, then DOS (as I say before) can cover most specialists
> requirements, so they state must be present in sources as is (for
> compatability reason) before going to next projects, and _first_ step must
> be development of develompent ;) tools. B-|
> 
> [...]
> 
> P.S. I recently look at listing from BC++ and think - what about "addon",
> which optimizes code through listing or .OBJ? What you think about? ;)

Are you volunteering?

Pat

-- 

+--------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Pat Villani                    | Email:            patv AT iop DOT com     |
|                                | Amateur call:     WB2GBF           |
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------+ 
| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber."            |
| -- Albert Einstein                                                  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

- Raw text -